Dog bite regulations in Arizona are set up in a way to be beneficial to those injured by dog bites. Here are the important points under Arizona law on dog bite cases: 

Strict Liability: Arizona implements a “strict liability” doctrine when it comes to dog bites. Dog owners can be held liable for injuries caused by a dog bite even if the owner believes the dog was not dangerous. This differs from “one-bite” states where an owner might only be held accountable if they were aware of the dog’s harmful tendencies.

Exceptions: The strict liability rule does not apply if the person bitten provoked the dog, trespassed, or otherwise committed an illegal conduct at the time of the bite. The dog owner can use these defenses to her advantage. 

Location Matters: In some contexts, where the bite occurred might be relevant. For instance, if the bite happens in a public place or if the victim is lawfully in a private place (such as the dog owner’s property), then the dog owner is generally liable. However, if the person bitten was unlawfully in a private place, the strict liability rule might not apply.

Negligence: Aside from the strict liability rule, a victim may also pursue a claim based on negligence if, for example, the owner was negligent in controlling or restraining the dog.

Statute of Limitations: In Arizona, the statute of limitations for dog bite claims is typically two years from the date of the bite.

Comparative Negligence: Since Arizona generally follows a comparative negligence standard, any damages awarded may be reduced based on the victim’s degree of fault.

Consult with a personal injury attorney in Arizona who is experienced in handling dog bite accident cases to better understand your specific situation and determine who might be liable. They can assess the facts, investigate the incident, and help pursue appropriate legal action if necessary.